SECURITY
Design principles, implemented controls and independent verification are different things. Our security story must keep them distinct.
PERMISSION BY DESIGN
| Boundary | Required explanation |
|---|---|
| Who is receiving it? | Identify the recipient and role; an account name alone is not proof of authority. |
| What information? | Name the selected records, observations or reported information. Keep excluded items clear. |
| For which purpose? | Connect access to a stated task, such as a visit preparation, rather than general all-record use. |
| For how long? | Explain expiry and what stopping future access does; it does not recall copies already received. |
| What happens on failure? | Distinguish an attempted action, an acknowledgment, a grant and a recipient reading the information. |
These are design requirements, not a statement that production product controls or certifications have been verified.
EVIDENCE SCOPE
The current work demonstrates a review website, original artwork and illustrative UI. It does not establish production product controls, clinical licensing, compliance certification, independent audits or uptime guarantees.
Design intentPermission boundaries, source provenance and recoverable states.
Website evidenceSource/build/deployment checks and selected keyboard, motion and fallback verification.
Product evidence still neededImplemented control inventory, responsible owners, test evidence, service scope and independently verified claims.